About Me

Name: Tom L.
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

A-Bombs

 

The nuclear weapon "Little Boy" was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, Japan on Monday, August 6, 1945, followed on August 9th by the detonation of the "Fat Man" nuclear bomb over Nagasaki. It is estimated (no one knows for sure) that the bombs killed as many as 140,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki.

Sixty-four years later, it is easy for some to say the bombs should not have been dropped. But, some prespective.

On the night of 9–10 March 1945, US Army Air Force B-29s dropped 1,700 tons of bombs on Tokoyo. Approximately 16 square miles of the city were destroyed and some 100,000 people are estimated to have died in the resulting firestorm. Not A-bombs -- firebombs, of which the US had many, many more to drop.

On Easter Sunday, April 1, 1945 (April Fool’s Day) the US invaded Okinawa. The battle has one of the highest number of casualties of any World War Two engagement: the Japanese lost over 100,000 troops, and the Allies (mostly United States) suffered more than 50,000 casualties, with over 12,000 killed in action. Hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed, wounded or attempted suicide. Approximately one-fourth of the civilian population died due to the invasion.

Had the USA not dropped the atomic bombs, and had an invasion of Japan been necessary, it is estimted that US and Allied casualties (dead, wounded, missing) would be 1.4 to 4.0 million. Japanese dead have been estimated at 5-10 million.

As absurd as it sounds, the US dropping the atomic bombs saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives; both Allied and Japanese.

On a personal note, my father was an Army sergeant scheduled to be part of the invasion force. Had the bombs not been dropped, he probably would have been killed and I would not be here.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Homeless

 

Now imagine the coverage if Rudolph Giuliani had implemented such a program. What if George W. Bush initiated a similar Federal program! One can almost hear the screams from the left.

According to The Liberal New York Times:

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg defended a city program to send homeless families out of New York on planes, trains and buses on Wednesday, saying it “saves the taxpayers of New York City an enormous amount of money.”

Speaking in the Blue Room in City Hall to announce a new finance commissioner, Mr. Bloomberg was asked if the program simply shifts the homelessness program to a different place, as some critics of the program have suggested.

“I don’t know, when they get to the other places, whether they find jobs,” Mr. Bloomberg said. “It may be an easier place for them. If we don’t — we either have two choices. We can do this program or pay an enormous amount of money daily to provide housing.”

It costs the city about $36,000 a year to provide shelter for a homeless family. The average stay in shelter is about nine months.

But Mr. Bloomberg appeared sensitive to the image of flying homeless families to far-flung places, as the program is set up to do. In the past two years, families have been provided one-way tickets to Haiti, Peru, Mexico City, St. Croix, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukraine, Santo Domingo and Casablanca. (The most popular destinations are Puerto Rico, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas.)

“The average cost is trivial,” Mr. Bloomberg said. “Most go by bus. Very few go overseas, very few go long distances. Bus is the normal ways we pay for transportation, rather than air.”

In fact, the most common mode of travel for families in the program is air, not bus. Forty-eight percent travel by airplane; 37 percent by bus; and 15 percent by train, according to city data.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

President Obama’s birth certificate

 

Count me among those who think that all this hoopla over President Obama’s birth certificate is a bunch of animal waste. Those pursuing this should investigate something much more critical and dangerous, like the Piltdown man.

However, according to the AP:

State officials again are confirming that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.

Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said Monday she has seen the original birth records that verify Obama was born in Hawaii, and is a "natural-born American citizen."

Fukino made the announcement in hopes of ending any lingering rumors about Obama's citizenship. She issued a similar press release Oct. 31.

State law bars release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible interest.

Excuse me, if the citizens of the United States do not have a “tangible interest” in their president’s birth certificate, one of the requirements to be president – who does.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Forced Abortion

 

If the facts as presented are shown to be correct, then the fascists have really taken over the country. According to the New York Post:

A Brooklyn nurse claims she was forced to choose between her religious convictions and her job when Mount Sinai Hospital ordered her to assist in a late-term abortion against her will…

The hospital even exaggerated the patient's condition and claimed the woman could die if the nurse, a devout Catholic, did not follow orders, the nurse alleges in a lawsuit…

The married mother of a year-old baby was 30 minutes into her early-morning shift when she realized she had been assigned to an abortion. She begged her supervisor to find a replacement nurse for the procedure. The hospital had a six-hour window to find a fill-in, the suit says…

Her pleas were rejected, and instead she was threatened with career-ending charges of insubordination and patient abandonment, according to the lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Brooklyn federal court.

If this is true, it clearly shows that those behind freedom of choice are for free choice as long as your choice agrees with their’s.
 
 
Tags: abortion  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voting on Sonia Sotomayor

 

According to the AP:

Sonia Sotomayor's success at her Supreme Court confirmation hearing has some Republicans in a tight spot, with conservative senators forced to weigh the political calculus of voting on the court's first Latina nominee, who also is the first liberal nominee in 15 years.

The underlying politics are dicey for Republicans. They must be careful to keep faith with constituents like National Rifle Association members who oppose her, yet avoid offending the Hispanic voters who represent the fastest-growing segment of the electorate.

Here is a unique idea for the Republican Senators, how about voting on her based on whether you think she is qualified to be a Supreme Court justice.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Deportation Flights

 

According to Reuters:

Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Flight Operations Unit, carrying out a policy begun under former President George W. Bush, has moved an average of 4,200 unauthorized migrants a week this year, up from 3,700 last year.

Wonder what liberals and Democrats (is there any other kind of Democrat?) would say if a Republican president had increased the number of illegal aliens deported?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin Obsession

 
 

What is with the liberal media’s obsession with Sarah Palin?

If you disregard articles on oil and gas, there was all but no national coverage of Mrs. Palin before July 2008.

The governor wrote an op-ed piece in The (liberal) New York Times on January 5, 2008 (on polar bears).

The Times of London on February 11, 2008 wrote: “Seeking to offset a Clinton-Obama duo with either an obscure female such as Sarah Palin (Governor of Alaska)…” Note at that point it was a Clinton-Obama ticket.

A few weeks later Mrs. Palin really got coverage: The Washington Post, February 27, 2008:

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is emerging as consensus pick for vice president among both Republicans and Democrats.

Well, not exactly, but, based on a perusal of the nearly 600 entries in our contest to pick a running mate for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and the 2,600 entries to select one for Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), a fair number of Loop Fans speculated that either candidate might pick Bloomberg as his No. 2…

…One entrant, from Cairo, picked 44-year-old Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R).

On May 26, 2008 Nat Hentoff in The Washington Times wrote a substantial piece putting forth Sarah Palin as the Republican vice-presidential nominee.

But, Newsweek, on June 16, 2008, wrote: “…conservatives talk up Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska, but she is all but unknown to McCain.”

One would guess that on June 30, 2008, outside of Alaska, almost zero percent of Americans would remember ever hearing of Sara Palin.

So, for discussions sake, say Sarah Palin “burst” onto the national scene on July 1, 2008. By election night in November her 15 minutes of fame should have ended.

That is just over four months in the spotlight.

Today, eight months after the election the liberal media cannot let go of Sarah Palin.

There is almost no rational explanation for their obsession.

Perhaps the best explanation is they are trying to make her the poster “girl” for Republicans and by vilifying her they hope their ongoing negative attacks on her will rub off on the entire Republican Party.

What other explanation is there?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy Birthday America

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Today it is worth remembering that our nation was founded on the above principles:

All are created equal.

That people’s rights come from God.

Government gets its power from the people.

Too many forget that the American Revolution gave the world a new form of government, in the words of Lincoln, government of the people, by the people, for the people”.
 
 
Happy birthday America and to the gifts America has given to the world.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Axis of Evil

 
 

“States like these [Iran, Iraq and North Korea], and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.”

President George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, January 29, 2002

In the years since President Bush labeled the “axis of evil”, liberals and Democrats have made much fun out of this “rhetoric” and Mr. Bush’s cowboy foreign policy.

Today, Iran is pursuing atomic weapons and killing its people in the streets. A U.S. navy vessel is tracking a North Korean ship which maybe carrying nuclear materials (perhaps to Iran) and North Korea is threatening nuclear war.

Now how do you feel about the axis of evil, Mr. Obama and your liberal friends, ?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Girl in School

 

Decades ago when I was a young lad in school, all the boys always had a fascination for the “new girl in school”. Who knows why, perhaps she was just something different.

In 2008 Barack Obama ran on a big government, huge social program, and immense spending platform. Some 69,500,000 people or almost 53% of those who voted, voted for Mr. Obama for president.

Today, according to the liberal Los Angeles Times:

Currently, 90% of Americans are worried to some degree about the exploding federal spending deficit, a galactic number certain to gain politicians' attention on both sides.

I know Mr. Obama was different, charismatic and promising change. But, what did everyone think he was going to do?

Buyer’s remorse is when you buy something, perhaps on the spur of the moment or to wanting to have the latest, and then realizing that you overpaid or the item was not what you expected.

Although Mr. Obama’s popularity is down, it is still pretty high, so I suspect buyer’s remorse has not set in – yet.

But, now that the new girl in school has been in class for a couple of months I think many of the “boys” realize she is not really all that different from all the other girls.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Universal Rights

 

During the 2000 presidential campaign, George Bush said: “I'm not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say, ‘This is the way it's got to be.’”

He was right. 

Unfortunately, driven by 9-11, President Bush adopted the policy of nation building.

President Obama, in Cairo, spoke of his “unyielding belief” in a set of universal principles, including “the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed, confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice, government that is transparent and doesn’t steal from the people, the freedom to live as you choose”.

Unfortunately, as with his predecessor, reality bites.

When it comes to the suppression of the protests in Iran, Mr. Obama seems unwilling to speak out for the protester’s rights to speak their minds and have a say in how they are governed, or confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice.

There is not always an American solution to every problem in the world. Certainly, America should not try to impose solutions.

America and the American president MUST stand on the hilltop and shout that we believe in the principles on which our nation was founded and believe those rights and freedoms are universal.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

North Korea

 

So you objected to the U.S. acting alone on international matters, you wanted America to work in a multi-nation coalition.

Now is the time for your multi-nation diplomacy to pay off.

France has a navy (# 3 worldwide), so do Russia (#4), China (#5), Germany (#7) and Italy (#8).

How about using some of that multi-national magic to get some of those navies to stop, board and inspect ships coming out of North Korea?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where's the Outrage?

 

Imagine if Rush Limbaugh said:

 

"Michelle Obama went to a Yankees Game yesterday … during the seventh inning stretch, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez."

 

Imagine the outrage.

 

The calls for Limbaugh to be taken off the air.

 

The calls for boycotts.

 

Blaming all Republicans and conservatives for thinking that sex with a minor is okay, something to joke about.

 

 

So, where is the outrage against David Letterman?

 

 

Tags: Letterman  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bermuda?


Devil’s Island

Alcatraz

Andersonville

Newgate

Abu Ghraib

Bermuda?

 

How can the world stand silently by and let the U.S. government force four untried, presumably innocent people to live in that most infamous of all prisons – Bermuda?

 

According to Fox News:

 

Four Uighur detainees from Guantanamo Bay have been sent to Bermuda, officials said Thursday. 

 

“By helping accomplish the president's objective of closing Guantanamo, the transfer of these detainees will make America safer,” Attorney General Eric Holder said.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Going to Palau

Dear Mr. President:

 

Recently on this blog I asked that you send to me the shares of GM and other corporations which you bought with my tax dollars. While I am waiting for them, I have another request.

 

According to The (liberal) New York Times:

 

The United States has won an agreement to transfer up to 17 Chinese Muslims [Uighurs] from the prison camp at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to Palau

 

The president of Palau, Johnson Toribiong, said his government had “agreed to accommodate the United States of America’s request” to “temporarily resettle” the detainees…

 

The United States has pledged $200 million in long-term development aid to Palau.

 

According to the Palau Visitors Authority website:

 

Palau enjoys a pleasantly warm climate all year round with an annual mean temperature of 82° F …Typhoons are rare as Palau is located outside the typhoon zone.

 

The official currency of the Republic is the U.S. Dollar. Visa, JCB, Master Card, and American Express cards are widely accepted at stores and visitor facilities. There are FDIC insured banks.

 

So, Mr. President, in addition to sending me all the stock you bought with my money, I am willing to “temporarily resettle” to Palau. Since the going rate for temporary resettlement seems to be about $12 million, I will agree to be temporarily resettled for only $10 million.

 

I am willing to agree to this bargain price since, unlike the Uighurs, I did not go to Afghanistan to train as a terrorist, and I am not trying to overthrow my government.

 

Thank you Mr. President.

 

P.S. For those who may not know, during World War II the battle for Peleliu (one of the islands of Palau) cost almost 10,000 Marine and Army casualties, and about 100 men are still listed as MIA.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive