About Me

Name: Tom L.
Location: Valdese, NC
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Election Night Meaning

Change we don't believe in
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When is a Minority a Majority?

 

“Numerous GOP officials have told POLITICO they worry that the party has been hijacked by a noisy and powerful minority...”

Wanting limited government interference in people’s lives; wanting government to live within its means as the people must; wanting personal responsibility and consequences for personal actions; wanting people and corporations to pay for their bad investments; wanting a safe home and country – these are majority views.

Yes, there are issues about which Americans disagree, but the vast majority of Americans agree on the above.

If you want to call that a conservative view than “GOP officials” and the media do not understand that conservatives are not a minority.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

564

564
 
As of today (April 17, 2009), 564 is the most important number in America.
 
564 is the number of days until election day 2010 - November 2nd.
 
On that day all the members of the House of Representatives and one-third of the senators will face election.
 
If you think they are taking this country in the right direction, vote for them.
 
If you think the country is headed in the worng direction, vote them out of office.
 
564 and counting down.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Incendiary Language

 

One of the issues that must be faced by the “right” is that verbal firebomb throwing may feel good, may excite some to “the cause”, but ultimately all it does is burn down your own house.

A well-known columnist recently wrote:

Working in a homeless shelter is widely regarded as “community service”-- as if aiding and abetting vagrancy is necessarily a service, rather than a disservice, to the community.

Is a community better off with more people not working, hanging out on the streets, aggressively panhandling people on the sidewalks, urinating in the street, leaving narcotics needles in the parks where children play?

Now his real point was on target:

In other words, people on the left want the right to impose their idea of what is good for society on others-- a right that they vehemently deny to those whose idea of what is good for society differs from their own.

But, by including the incendiary language on the homeless what do you think most people will remember?

Now obviously, my view of those in a homeless shelter is vastly different than this columnist’s view. 

First, helping those less fortunate is a Christian value and beyond that I would hope our society and government would have a level of “caring”. What the level should be can be debated.

Second, not all homeless are: “hanging out on the streets, aggressively panhandling people on the sidewalks, urinating in the street, leaving narcotics needles in the parks”.

Beyond that, such language reinforces the idea that Republicans, conservatives, “the right”, do not care about people.

Most Americans, even those who have had encounters with the type of homeless described, want to think of themselves as kind-hearted, caring people. When they read or hear someone on the right use such language Americans have an almost automatic negative response – feeling/thinking like that is not who they want to be.

So continue to use such incendiary language if you want to burn down your own house. If you want to move into the Congress or the White House, just stop.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Golden Rule

 

What should conservatives and Republicans do now? Simple, follow the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Treat President Obama with the respect you thought the liberals and Democrats should have treated President Bush.

Even when you disagree with President Obama’s foreign policy decisions, especially regarding our troops in the field, remember all those who so opposed President Bush that they said things that were not supportive of America. Support the President for the sake of America, if you cannot openly support his decisions, be silent. Never seem to be the position of not supporting the President to the determent of America.

If you thought it was “dumb” for the Democrats to complain about President Bush’s use of Executive Orders, do not complain about President Obama’s use of them. If need be, disagree on his position, but not his legitimate use of his Presidential authority.

The President is entitled to have the administration he desires. Quietly and quickly approve his nominees for his Cabinet, etc. Save your opposition for when it matters, on the appointment of judges and then only oppose those where you have a real legitimate reason. Remember, just because the President nominated them is not a legitimate reason.

Do not be against something just because the President is for something. Be silent in most opposition and again, save your vocal opposition for the big issues. Be statesmen and women in your opposition.

For eight years Democrats and liberals whined about how the 2000 election was “stolen”. President Obama won the election; you cannot change that so move on.

Regarding the President’s family, if you cannot say something nice, do not say anything. 

Remember all the name calling directed toward President Bush and do not do that to President Obama. Statements such as the recent Marxist, Hitler reference are not only stupid, but turn the people against you. When someone makes such a statement, quickly and strongly condemn it. If you cannot condemn it, at least issue a statement saying something to the effect of “I’m sure that is not what he or she meant…” Then, especially if it is a Republican official, get a hold of the person and tell them they need to: 1) retract/explain away their stupid statement, and 2) shut up.

So remember, do unto the Democratic President they way you wish they would do unto the Republican President.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not About Race


The 2008 presidential election may have been about “change”, “the economy stupid”, “the country is headed in the wrong direction”, etc. One thing that the election was not about was race.

Compare how President-elect Obama did in 2008, versus Senator John Kerry in 2004, and Vice President Al Gore in 2000.

Obama 2008

Kerry 2004

Gore 2000

Men

49%

44%

42%

Women

56%

51%

54%

White

43%

41%

42%

Black

95%

88%

90%

Hispanic

67%

56%

62%

Asian

62%

58%

54%

18-29

66%

54%

48%

30-44

52%

46%

48%

45-59

49%

48%

48%

60+

47%

46%

51%

Not H.S. grad.

63%

50%

59%

H.S. grad.

52%

47%

48%

Some college

51%

46%

45%

College grad.

53%

49%

48%

First time voter

69%

53%

52%

Protestant

45%

40%

40%

Catholic

54%

47%

49%

Jewish

78%

74%

79%

Big Cities

70%

60%

71%

Small Cities

59%

49%

57%

Suburbs

50%

47%

47%

Small Towns

45%

48%

38%

Rural

45%

40%

37%

Total Votes

65,431,955

59,028,444

50,999,897

% of votes

52.6%

48.3%

48.4%

Obama did poorer than either Kerry or Gore in four categories:

Obama 2008

Kerry 2004

Gore 2000

60+

47%

46%

51%

Jewish

78%

74%

79%

Big Cities

70%

60%

71%

Small Towns

45%

48%

38%

Obama drew only 47% of the age 60+ voters, 4% less than Gore, but only 1% less than Kerry. Gore received 1% more of the Jewish vote and 1% more of the Big City vote. Kerry received 3% more than Obama in Small Towns, but Obama outdrew Gore by 7%.

There have been 16 presidential elections held since the end of World War II. In six of the 16 the winning candidate drew a higher percentage of the vote than Obama. The only non-incumbents who outdrew Obama were Eisenhower in 1952 (being the general who “won” the war in Europe may have helped) and George H.W. Bush in 1988 (and, of course, Bush was a sitting vice president).

Obama’s 52.6% is higher than Clinton’s or George W. Bush’s in either of their elections, Reagan’s and Nixon’s first elections, and Truman, Kennedy and Carter.

Johnson 1964

61.1%

Nixon 1972

60.7%

Reagan 1984

58.8%

Eisenhower 1956

57.6%

Eisenhower 1952

55.2%

Bush 1988

53.4%

Obama 2008

52.6%

Reagan 1980

50.7%

Bush 2004

50.7%

Carter 1976

50.1%

Kennedy 1960

49.7%

Truman 1948

49.6%

Clinton 1996

49.2%

Bush 2000

47.9%

Nixon 1968

43.4%

Clinton 1992

43.0%

So, despite all the pre-election hand-wringing about racism being a factor, Americans may have voted the way they did for a number of reasons, but race wasn’t a significant issue.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Satisfying Election

 

America often seems polarized: are you conservative, Republican, or liberal, Democrat? Too often in our political discussions we use these terms interchangeably as if all conservatives are Republicans, and all liberals Democrats.

It is certainly true that more Republicans are conservative than liberal, but there are liberal Republicans, just as there are conservative Democrats, although most Democrats are liberal. The liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats are seen by their own parties and the media as so strange that they are often dismissed outright. 

For those of you old enough, Nelson Rockefeller was a liberal Republican. One does not have to go back three decades to uncover liberal Republicans. Rudy Giuliani is a liberal Republican. Of course, liberal Republicans are still seen as conservative by most Democrats and liberals. Clearly, Giuliani is to the right of, say, Barney Frank.

John McCain touted himself as a maverick. Before the campaign he was a moderate Republican. Just after he was nominated remember all the discussion about McCain’s need to win over the conservative base. No need to do that if he was a conservative. As the campaign progressed, McCain’s comments and stance on many issues portrayed him as a liberal Republican.

There really is no need to go into a post mortem on why McCain lost: Bush’s unpopularity, the war in Iraq, the economic crisis, etc. Name the last moderate or liberal Republican to be elected president. To make life a little easier, let’s just consider the Republicans who were elected president since World War II: Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush.

At the time, Eisenhower was considered a conservative; no question about Nixon or Reagan being conservative; George H. W. Bush was elected as a conservative successor to Reagan then moved to the center and lost in his re-election bid; George W. Bush is certainly considered a conservative, although I believe he is responsible for killing the “Reagan Revolution”.

So, it would seem in the last 56 years, for a Republican to be elected president he had to be viewed as conservative. But, being conservative and being a conservative Republican are not synonymous.

Perhaps the best commonly used tag line to define a conservative is “small government”. In the mythology of the fans of Newt Gingrich this has come to mean the Federal government should spend less: cut the budget, cut the deficit.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...

The conservative Jeffersonian idea of “small government” is individual rights: …to secure these rights, Governments are instituted…

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union… The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. The Constitution, established by We the People delineates the powers of the Federal government, but those powers not granted to the Federal government are reserved to the people.

It is on this foundation that true conservatives and many “conservative” Republicans part ways. In most cases, certainly on social issues, if it is a choice between government or the people making a determination, conservatives believe that the people should always decide.

This does not mean that the people, “the majority” always rules. We live under a democratic (people vote) republican (representative) form of government. We empower our elected officials to give direction to our nation. In foreign policy this is most apparent in the defense of the nation. In domestic matters it is most critical in defense of individual rights. It is most obvious in the civil rights legislation of the 1960’s. The people would have never voted for civil rights, but the people’s elected representatives provided direction to the nation by their conservative understanding that the rights of the people had to be extended to all the people.

Which bring in a subject for another time, the incorrect and misleading use of conservative when what is really meant is reactionary. Contrary to the reactionaries who were against civil rights and were labeled as conservatives, true conservatives would want government to protect the rights of all the people.

As a conservative who is an independent (not registered as a Republican or Democrat), I am quite satisfied with the results of the 2008 presidential election. Now it may seem shocking that a conservative could be satisfied with the election of Barack Obama, a Democrat and apparently a liberal. I am sure I will be dissatisfied with many of President Obama’s policies, stands on issues, appointments, etc., just as I was with our current “conservative” president.

In a republican democracy there is no greater individual right than the right to vote. In a free and fair election, We the People elected Barack Obama. As a conservative American I find that very satisfying.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »